Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:00:42 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Please test the latest snapshot!
Message-ID: <20090804180042.GC5001@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <347438636 DOT 8310991249398331327 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net>  <1103417648 DOT 8356341249403449340 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1103417648.8356341249403449340.JavaMail.root@sz0059a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:30:49PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
>> I'm still seeing some weird stuff in the latest snapshot.  This is
>> a fresh install, with nothing other than the Base category + git,
>> and substituting just cygwin1.dll.
>> 
>> $ git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/libsigsegv.git
>> Initialized empty Git repository in /home/eblake/libsigsegv/.git/
>> fatal: write error (Socket operation on non-socket)
>
>I'm seeing this behavior even as far back as snapshot 20090706, so it
>may be some BLODA on this particular machine, rather than a new
>failure in the latest snapshot.  Other than this weird behavior of
>git, I haven't seen anything else misbehave with the 20090804 snapshot.

Does that mean you don't see the problem with the 20090704 snapshot or
that you haven't tested that far back?

I'll try this command out as soon as I can.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple