X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Haojun Bao To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Emacs can't start-process more than 30~40 processes References: <83iqhlbgoc DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <4A6727A8 DOT 2090905 AT cornell DOT edu> <83iqhkur2h DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <834osy98jo DOT fsf_-_ AT gmail DOT com> <83tz0xtt6c DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <20090729023256 DOT GC11458 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <838wi8vt9v DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <20090729232522 DOT GC13645 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:19:03 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20090729232522.GC13645@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:25:22 -0400") Message-ID: <83y6q70xyw.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.96 (cygwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor writes: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:32:28PM +0800, Haojun Bao wrote: >>> >>> Not necessarily. We don't expect these functions to return NULL. It >>> would be interesting to know how many fds are open at this point. If it >>> is a large number then maybe we have to start enforcing an fd max. If >>> it is a "small" number then something is wrong and we're allocating too >>> much of the cygheap. The cygheap was always supposed to be relatively >>> small. Maybe we're abusing it too much in 1.7. >> >>There are quite some fds. In start-process, emacs will allocate 1 PTY >>and 1 pipe for each process it starts. > > Yes, I assumed that there were a bunch of fds but I was looking for an > exact number rather than "quite some". I can't give exact details about > how to find the number now but I thought that since you were looking at > the code it wouldn't be too hard to figure this value out. > Sorry. There are a total of 40 fds in one test run from /proc/PID/fd. Seems the PTYs and pipes are allocated and released soon, what remains are /dev/ptmx fds. $'ls' -l /proc/5668/fd total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 bhj None 0 2006-12-01 08:00 0 -> /dev/tty2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 bhj None 0 2006-12-01 08:00 1 -> /dev/tty2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 bhj None 0 2006-12-01 08:00 2 -> /dev/tty2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 bhj None 0 2006-12-01 08:00 37 -> /dev/tty36 lrwxrwxrwx 1 bhj None 0 2006-12-01 08:00 38 -> pipe:[2180]| lrwxrwxrwx 1 bhj None 0 2006-12-01 08:00 39 -> pipe:[2232]| ... #bhj: fd 3-36 are all opened -> /dev/ptmx ... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple