X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:36:14 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: MVFS results Message-ID: <20090721143614.GA27613@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20090718101123 DOT GA8581 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090720153636 DOT GQ27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090720174912 DOT GT27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090721081047 DOT GV27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jul 21 14:32, Eric Blake wrote: > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > > How cute. I have reworked the patch slightly to encapsulate the MVFS > > code somewhat more. I've checked it in. Please try if it still works > > as advertised. > > Your patch swapped the order of the actions in relation to mine (by working on > the original then the duplicate handle), but fortunately, it passed my tests. That was actually the idea. Of course I just *hoped* that this will still work as expected... > I think we've pounded the last nail into the coffin of overcoming reported MVFS > deficiencies, and this thread can finally RIP. I'm glad to read that. Thanks again for your persistence in testing, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple