X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Eric Blake Subject: Re: MVFS results Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:32:14 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <20090715204831 DOT GA27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090718101123 DOT GA8581 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090720153636 DOT GQ27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090720174912 DOT GT27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090721081047 DOT GV27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > How cute. I have reworked the patch slightly to encapsulate the MVFS > code somewhat more. I've checked it in. Please try if it still works > as advertised. Your patch swapped the order of the actions in relation to mine (by working on the original then the duplicate handle), but fortunately, it passed my tests. I think we've pounded the last nail into the coffin of overcoming reported MVFS deficiencies, and this thread can finally RIP. -- Eric Blake -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple