X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:46:40 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: MVFS results
Message-ID: <20090717164640.GA27613@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <loom DOT 20090715T192219-408 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20090715204831 DOT GA27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20090715T213245-387 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20090716090703 DOT GH27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20090716T133741-21 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20090716151121 DOT GO27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20090716T154525-611 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20090716165112 DOT GS27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20090716T165527-559 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <loom.20090716T165527-559@post.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jul 16 17:15, Eric Blake wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes:
> > Eric Blake wrote:
> > > Maybe for MVFS it would be better to
> > > return EBUSY instead of letting unlink succeed when the handle is
> > > still open by another process:
> > 
> > That would be something I could add, but this isn't overly important
> > right now, IMHO.  Just bug me with this again at one point.  I assume
> > this can be a generic solution as well for any remote filesystem.
> 
> Agreed that this would be nice, but I'm okay with post 1.7.1.

I applied a patch which now always returns EBUSY if a sharing violation
occurs on a remote filesystem.  Please give it a thorough check.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple