X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:18:34 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.7] bug in chdir Message-ID: <20090715181834.GX27613@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20090715084635 DOT GQ27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A5DCFA7 DOT 9020106 AT byu DOT net> <20090715133117 DOT GA25645 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090715144256 DOT GB31834 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jul 15 17:38, Eric Blake wrote: > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > > I created a patch which uses WNetOpenEnum for the existence check, but > > it needs extremly long to timeout the existence check in such a case. > [...] > So, no obvious speed regression on good paths, a whopping 25% performance > improvement on paths that previously failed, and the desired failure on the > questionable path is now achieved with speed comparable to the success path! > I'd say go ahead and apply the patch - the numbers speak for themselves. Thanks for testing. Checked in. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple