X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4A574020.1040603@sidefx.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:20:32 -0400
From: Edward Lam <edward AT sidefx DOT com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: dash vs. ash?
References: <9e3fd2c80907100137s1c478e23s3ede80d7f8484355 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090710084147 DOT GA12569 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <20090710084147.GA12569@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I think dash is preferred in future.  In theory we should dash hardlink
> to ash and deprecate the ash package entirely.  It's about time.  Eric?

Is dash as fast as ash?

-Edward

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple