X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:51:08 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: readline-6.0.3-2, libreadline7-6.0.3-2 Message-ID: <20090706165107.GB20446@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4A51EBEB DOT 5050703 AT byu DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A51EBEB.5050703@byu.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 06:19:55AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >According to Eric Blake on 7/6/2009 6:14 AM: >> A new release 6.0.3-2 for readline and libreadline7 is now available for >> use in cygwin 1.7, replacing 6.0.3-1. Cygwin 1.5 users are unaffected by >> this change. >> >> Please check the mailing lists - if no one else has offered feedback for a >> particular version of windows, then feel free to offer your feedback >> (success or failure) so I can know whether using the new binutils to build >> the package made a difference. > >To set the example for what I want: I see no difference between 6.0.3-1 or >6.0.3-2 on Windows XP; both versions of libreadline7 allowed bash >3.2.49-23 to start just fine for me. I no longer have a problem with bash on Windows 7. I won't be able to try XP for a while. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple