X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A51758D.3030502@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:54:53 +0100 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Full 1.7 Install -> "Insufficient disk space to repair security descriptor at index $SII for file 9" References: <4A50FE82 DOT 9010407 AT ou DOT edu> <4A516F39 DOT 9080903 AT cygwin DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4A516F39.9080903@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > Stephen M. Kenton wrote: >> While I was there I decided to try Cygwin 1.7 and I did a new install >> of everything. Shortly after it finished installing I got a strange >> return from a "find" command so I scheduled a scan disk and rebooted >> so it could run. There were 20GB free on disk, but I got a couple of >> messages (paraphrased) about "Insufficient disk space to repair >> security descriptor at index $SII for file 9" and index "$SDH for file9". Was the partition created and/or formatted from the Linux side, using ntfstools for example, before windows was installed to it? Or did you use the format option in the windows installer? > Sounds to me like it could be a hardware or file system issue which > coincidentally you see surface after you install and run Cygwin. Cygwin > apps work in user space and can't crash Windows unless they happen to > tickle an O/S bug or other external instability. Cygwin doesn't use raw block I/O to write corrupted disk block structures to your HD, that's for sure. But one thing it does do that's a bit unusual is to create a hell of a lot of ACLs, compared to a standard windows installation where most stuff doesn't have a custom ACL and just inherits from the directory tree. I wonder if for some reason this drive got formatted in a funny way that didn't leave enough room for entries in the security descriptor database special files? cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple