X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4A51553C.3080406@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:37:00 +0100
From: Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT xartimi AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: fresh 1.7, bash fails with STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION
References: <4A51008E DOT 9050205 AT verizon DOT net>
In-Reply-To: <4A51008E.9050205@verizon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Vincent R. wrote:

> bash                 3.2.49-22              OK
> libreadline6         5.2.14-12              OK
> libreadline7         6.0.3-1                OK

Jerry DeLisle wrote:

> bash                 3.2.49-22
> libreadline6         5.2.14-12
> libreadline7         6.0.3-1

  Err, ok.  So you've got the working versions.  So why do you think you're
getting the same bug at all?

  Surely this *has* to be some entirely different issue than the one that's
breaking a version of bash that you aren't using on a version of windows that
you aren't using?

    cheers,
      DaveK

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple