X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:06:58 +0200 From: "Vincent R." To: Eric Blake Cc: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated [security]: bash-3.2.49-23 and Windows 7 RC In-Reply-To: References: <4A4D200E DOT 9050401 AT sidefx DOT com> <4A4D2342 DOT 6050400 AT sidefx DOT com> <4A4D4BA8 DOT 8090202 AT byu DOT net> <4A4E09CC DOT 4050904 AT sidefx DOT com> Message-ID: <687446b0a5e2b63377c3da2a5238d457@mail.smartmobili.com> X-Sender: forumer AT smartmobili DOT com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:03:35 +0000 (UTC), Eric Blake wrote: > Edward Lam sidefx.com> writes: > >> > 61020293 looks like an address in the dll range, probably cygwin1.dll. >> > It >> > would be nice to know what function is dying, but doing that may >> > require >> > rebuilding a bash image with debugging symbols. Did you by chance do >> > any >> > rebasing? Maybe this is a case where I didn't use the correct gcc-4 >> > flags >> > for compilation, at which point an updated binutils/gcc might fix >> > things. is it the first time you compile readline with gcc-4 ? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple