X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A4E09CC.4050904@sidefx.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:38:20 -0400 From: Edward Lam User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated [security]: bash-3.2.49-23 and Windows 7 RC References: <4A4D200E DOT 9050401 AT sidefx DOT com> <4A4D2342 DOT 6050400 AT sidefx DOT com> <4A4D4BA8 DOT 8090202 AT byu DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4A4D4BA8.8090202@byu.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Eric Blake wrote: > 61020293 looks like an address in the dll range, probably cygwin1.dll. It > would be nice to know what function is dying, but doing that may require > rebuilding a bash image with debugging symbols. Did you by chance do any > rebasing? Maybe this is a case where I didn't use the correct gcc-4 flags > for compilation, at which point an updated binutils/gcc might fix things. No, I didn't do any rebasing. I also tried using rebaseall and peflagsall to no avail. Incidentally, is installing the bash and libreadline source broken? If I install the src for say, the make package, it installs it into a subdirectory under /usr/src. But when I tried to do the same for bash-3.2.49-23, I just got a bash src tar ball along with a bunch of patch files. Is this expected? -Edward -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple