X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:46:47 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated [security]: bash-3.2.49-23 Message-ID: <20090702174647.GE9839@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <55392 DOT 99 DOT 237 DOT 216 DOT 211 DOT 1246503158 DOT squirrel AT www DOT sidefx DOT com> <4A4C238B DOT 8070804 AT byu DOT net> <20090702031625 DOT GA23085 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4A4CAD63 DOT 50101 AT sidefx DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A4CAD63.50101@sidefx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:51:47AM -0400, Edward Lam wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>And for those who want to wail about this, take a look at the various >>"Why is Cygwin so slow????" threads that have been here in the last >>month. Every special case accommodation we make to allow MS-DOSisms to >>work seamlessly adds code to Cygwin and cause corresponding slowness >>for everything. > >That's an interesting view. So are you saying that this is why MINGW >is faster? No, they just aren't as mean as we are. We like to make things purposely slow because then people suffer. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple