X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A4CAD63.50101@sidefx.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:51:47 -0400 From: Edward Lam User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated [security]: bash-3.2.49-23 References: <55392 DOT 99 DOT 237 DOT 216 DOT 211 DOT 1246503158 DOT squirrel AT www DOT sidefx DOT com> <4A4C238B DOT 8070804 AT byu DOT net> <20090702031625 DOT GA23085 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20090702031625.GA23085@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > And for those who want to wail about this, take a look at the various > "Why is Cygwin so slow????" threads that have been here in the last > month. Every special case accommodation we make to allow MS-DOSisms > to work seamlessly adds code to Cygwin and cause corresponding slowness > for everything. That's an interesting view. So are you saying that this is why MINGW is faster? -Edward -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple