X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:47:13 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: To boost maintainer Message-ID: <20090701204712.GB20186@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <320e992a0907011250p1b478b24r4534297cd5ec51a5 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <320e992a0907011250p1b478b24r4534297cd5ec51a5@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:50:28PM +0300, Eray Ozkural wrote: >No, you have not done adequate testing obviously. And you have not adequately understood how to use email. Starting a new accusatory thread, expecting people to remember you and your important assertions, without any references to past discussions makes you seem rather clueless. >Also, why is it so difficult to accept that there may be something >wrong with gcc-4 in cygwin? Somebody wrote a patch that has only >limited applicability, and guess what it does have limited >applicability. Because, given the hostility and arrogance of your email, it is very easy to dismiss your opinions. >PS: CC to me I am not subscribed to this list And, then there's this, too. You desperately need to read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple