X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Andrew Schulman <schulman DOT andrew AT epamail DOT epa DOT gov>
Subject:  Re: To boost maintainer
Date:  Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:41:57 -0400
Lines: 16
Message-ID:  <7dhn451vq4av57c014scca8jrrk31e6v1h@4ax.com>
References:  <320e992a0907011250p1b478b24r4534297cd5ec51a5 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
X-Archive: encrypt
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> No, you  have not done adequate testing obviously.
> 
> I know what I'm doing and I tested 1.39 and it DOES NOT WORK with
> cygwin gcc-4, you have to compile gcc yourself if you want it to work.
> 
> Stop giving wrong information to people, you are wasting others' time.
> I see that you've said exactly the same thing to somebody else who
> couldn't get it to work.

Dude.  Sorry things aren't working out as you'd like, but a nasty tone like
that just closed off any possibility of anyone here helping you.  I think
your only two options now are to apologize or leave.

> PS: CC to me I am not subscribed to this list

Right!  What else?


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple