X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090701092617.GU30864@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <20090625145005 DOT GB18338 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090629092857 DOT GZ30864 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090629095322 DOT GD30864 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090629142348 DOT GB19123 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090629144030 DOT GC19123 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4A490F0E DOT 6040806 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20090630112617 DOT GS30864 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A4A3B64 DOT 4030004 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20090701092617 DOT GU30864 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:23:14 -0400 Message-ID: <2bf229d30907010723r3d1e38caxbb8cc70d998b4ac7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Call for TESTING (was Re: [1.7.0-50] scp progress counter flies through first 175 MB or so) From: Chris Sutcliffe To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Anyway, using ssh/scp with the latest from CVS looks much better now. > It doesn't eat up all CPU anymore and the performance looks pretty > well as far as I can tell. Are these changes captured in the 2009/06/30 snapshot? Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe http://emergedesktop.org -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple