X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:46:15 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bug: /registry file system doesn't return len of default value of keys Message-ID: <20090630084615.GR30864@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4A48343F DOT 6000304 AT tlinx DOT org> <20090629093449 DOT GB30864 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A493EAD DOT 1000607 AT tlinx DOT org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A493EAD.1000607@tlinx.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jun 29 15:22, Linda Walsh wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Jun 28 20:25, Linda Walsh wrote: >>> Known bug? Is it in the queue to be fixed someday? :-) >> >> Works in Cygwin 1.7 > ---- > Hmmm...its still in testing? How stable is it? Quite stable, with kinks. I venture the guess that the number of bugs is not higher than with 1.5.25. They are just different. > Am I going to inflict, upon myself, more pain than I gain? :-) Come on, whom do you ask? > And BTW, what happened to 1.6? current release says its still at 1.5.25-15 The 1.6.x, 1.8.x numbers are reserved for the Red Hat supported releases. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple