X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A471802.5030001@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:13:06 -0500 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [RFC] jpeg library References: <4A466538 DOT 8030007 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4A46FAA4 DOT 2 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4A470ADF DOT 5010306 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> In-Reply-To: <4A470ADF.5010306@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 28/06/2009 01:17, Charles Wilson wrote: > Nope. Upstream development is DEAD. There was some flurry of activity > about two years ago, but it never went anywhere. If IJG's libjpeg > wasn't so widespread and widely used, I'd want to look at some other > library that supports the format... Actually, are you sure about that? http://www.ijg.org/ lists a version 7, released yesterday, as the current version. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple