Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:34:41 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc-4 is broken on both cygwin-1.5 and cygwin-1.7
Message-ID: <20090624193441.GB1472@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <320e992a0906241109x199f213dw153feca72fb6de28 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <320e992a0906241109x199f213dw153feca72fb6de28@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:09:52PM +0300, Eray Ozkural wrote:
>It cost me a lot of time but I verified that gcc-4 is malfunctioning
>on both versions.
>
>It's impossible to build boost-1.38 or build-1.39, even if you build
>only static libs.
>
>I had to use the gcc 4 that I had built myself previously on cygwin-1.5
>
>And I think boost is pretty essential.
>
>Did you patch gcc-4 or something? Whatever it is, I would like an
>unpatched version if possible, as a C++ user. Could you make an
>alternative package please? It must be that auto-import thingie that's
>FUBAR'd.
>
>At any rate, C++/boost users attention: don't use cygwin's own gcc-4
>package, it's badly broken.

The person who maintains gcc/g++ is ready, willing, and able to fix
problems.  This content free report does not give him anything to work
with, however.

You have to do a much better job of reporting the problem if you truly
want a solution and don't just want to complain.
--
Christopher Faylor
Cygwin Co-Project Leader

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple