X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A3F8955.3080407@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:38:29 +0100 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: HEADSUP maintainers: Packages install scripts without execute permissions References: <4A3D1570 DOT 5020506 AT aim DOT com> <20090622094310 DOT GN5039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090622131144 DOT GR5039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20090622131144.GR5039@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi, > > > Here's the problem: If you exec shell scripts, they should only be run > if the user trying to run the script has execute permissions on the > script. Shell scripts don't _have_ to be executable, only if you want to launch one as if it were a command, rather than sourcing it. Why don't we just remove the "-c" and get setup.exe to use the simple "bash " syntax meaning "treat as a text file, open it and pipe it to stdin"? [davek AT ubique src]$ cat happy-script-file.txt echo "I am a happy script file!" [davek AT ubique src]$ ls -la happy-script-file.txt -rw-rw-r-- 1 davek davek 33 2009-06-22 14:35 happy-script-file.txt [davek AT ubique src]$ ./happy-script-file.txt bash: ./happy-script-file.txt: Permission denied [davek AT ubique src]$ bash -c ./happy-script-file.txt bash: ./happy-script-file.txt: Permission denied [davek AT ubique src]$ bash ./happy-script-file.txt I am a happy script file! [davek AT ubique src]$ AFAIK this final syntax is equivalent to writing "cat happy-script-file.txt | bash", where of course the execute bits couldn't make any difference. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple