X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_83,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A3EF760.2000205@cygwin.com> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:15:44 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit References: <200906191739 DOT n5JHcoBi001404 AT spam DOT trcww DOT com> <4A3BEE25 DOT 9010508 AT cygwin DOT com> <1C88F13C5CE84452AE2F41F23365AB73 AT trcintl DOT com> <4A3C0794 DOT 7060808 AT cygwin DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Lists wrote: >> Lists wrote: >>> Larry Hall wrote: >>>> >>>> Can you upgrade to the latest Cygwin 1.7 package and try again. >>>> From your >>>> cygcheck output, it looks like things are not correct but this may >>>> be just >>>> a problem with an old cygcheck that doesn't know how to find the >>>> implicit >>>> mounts. If the issue is still the same, resending the output of the >>>> new >>>> cygcheck would be helpful. >>> >>> I just downloaded the newest version of cygwin 1.7 as of 6-19-09 at >>> approximately 3:30 CST and had the exact same results. Please find >>> the new cygcheck.out file attached. You mentioned above that their >>> might be a problem with the mounts. Not sure if it helps to know >>> this, but I can successfully use rsync to copy many gigabytes of >>> files. It just hangs when there are thousands of files in a single >>> directory (9,000 seems to always do it.). Also note that this >>> cygcheck was done on a different computer than the first just to make >>> sure this isn't computer specific. Again, I have tried it on several. >>> >>> Thank you in advance. >> >> Your cygcheck output looks more like what I would expect except that it >> is truncated. Does this happen when you run it or did it just get >> stopped >> early? >> >> -- >> Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com >> RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office >> 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX >> Holliston, MA 01746 >> > > It didn't get stoped early, that is just what it looks like on this > machine. I ran it again to verify and got what appears to be the same > thing, at least it seems to stop in the same place. This particular > machine runs Windows Vista so perhaps that has something to do with it? > Either way, the rsync results were the same. Attached you should find > another copy created on yet another machine. Rsync results remain the > same. This machine runs XP. OK, this makes me very suspicious that something is getting in your way. 'cygcheck -srv' should contain allot more information than that. And while I might suspect Vista (though was always able to get valid output on the Vista installation I used to have), I would never expect a problem getting the complete output on XP unless something was interfering. Perhaps you're experiencing the effects of ? Ironically, if this is the problem, the cygcheck output is designed to help spot this kind of problem... -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple