X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:26:56 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [BUG 1.7 getopt_long() and recv()] has problem for tftp-hpa-5.0 on cygwin-1.7/win2003 Message-ID: <20090613162656.GA31874@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <518665 DOT 36225 DOT qm AT web110505 DOT mail DOT gq1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <20090613153649 DOT GA30259 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090613153649.GA30259@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:36:50AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 02:02:32AM -0700, Xiaoqiang Zheng wrote: >>* getopt_long() not work properly for tftp-hpa-5.0 on cygwin-1.7/win2003 >>* getopt_long() not work properly for tftp-hpa-5.0 on cygwin-1.5.25-15/win2003 > >I've read both of your messages (please just send one) and I don't see >a description of the problem. > >>* recv() has problem for tftp-hpa-5.0 on cygwin-1.7/win2003 >> recv() has same problem for tftpd of inetutils-1.5.6 on cygwin-1.7/win2003 >> >>* recv() has no problem on cygwin 1.5.25-15/win2003 >> recv() has no problem for tftpd of inetutils-1.5.6 on 1.5.25-15/win2003 > >Ditto. I see printfs with "cygwin:" added but no explanation of >the problem. > >Rather than focusing on capturing random bits of output you need to send >one (1) mail message with a description of the problem. Read >http://cygwin.com/problems.html and try, unlike 99% of the people here, >to comprehend that it is more than a page which says "attach cygcheck >output" to your bug reports. In particular, pay attention to the link: > >http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > >The goal here is to make it as easy as possible for someone to help >you. And just to be clear, I'm not saying that the details are not in the message. However, in particular, the getopt problem is far from clear. The bug report is overly obscured by excessive amounts of basically irrelvant information. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/