X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_24,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A2D4F87.1090407@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:51:03 -0500 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.7] Cannot read /proc/stat References: <4A2D3C62 DOT 40408 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20090608171454 DOT GA25642 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20090608171454.GA25642@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 08/06/2009 12:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Confirmed. The reason is that a datastructure on the NT level has > another size on 64 bit systems, and the WOW64 layer doesn't translate > the structure into the 32 bit format. The function is unsupported, so > that makes sort of sense. I'll create another solution using the > official function for to fetch that information. Unfortunaltey it > doesn't exist on NT4, so I have to sp3cial case that(*) Thanks. > (*) Is anybody here actually still using NT4? It looks like MS dropped support for NT4 in 2004[1]. Since we are dropping support for 9x/ME for the same reason, why not NT4? [1] http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifewinfaq#Windows%20NT%20Server Yaakov -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/