X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:40:56 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.7] Cannot read /proc/stat Message-ID: <20090608174055.GA27506@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4A2D3C62 DOT 40408 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20090608171454 DOT GA25642 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <2bf229d30906081032t39a30fc0v85131544100512f0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2bf229d30906081032t39a30fc0v85131544100512f0@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 01:32:33PM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> (*) Is anybody here actually still using NT4? > >Since support for 9x is ending in 1.7, shouldn't NT4 support also end? The decision to stop supporting 9x was mainly due to the desire to use the more advanced API which is not availalbe on the MS-DOS based versions of Windows. NT4 has enough functionality that I don't see any reason to stop supporting it quite yet. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/