X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20090606093102.GJ23519@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <20090512165404 DOT GW21324 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> 	 <416096c60905120956n5521929bm69586f5e6325a994 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <20090512173153 DOT GY21324 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> 	 <3f0ad08d0905140858j17c7b374paa649f18ef18178d AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <200905201652 DOT n4KGqYGm000509 AT mail DOT bln1 DOT bf DOT nsn-intra DOT net> 	 <200906051625 DOT n55GP6t3028411 AT mail DOT bln1 DOT bf DOT nsn-intra DOT net> 	 <20090606093102 DOT GJ23519 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 22:06:34 +0900
Message-ID: <3f0ad08d0906060606v104d21c1se874996b6c51a51@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [1.7] wcwidth failing configure tests]
From: IWAMURO Motonori <deenheart AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sourceware DOT org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

2009/6/6 Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>:
> I vote for @cjkwide, regardless of Andy's objection. =A0People using CJK
> will know the meaning and it has the additional advantage to be a rather
> simple to memorize identifier.

I oppose @cjkwide approach because I don't think that I need make
special cases give priority more than general cases.

I think that Andy's approach is better.
--=20
IWAMURO Motnori <http://vmi.jp/>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/