X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A288B1C.7010104@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:03:56 +0100 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] gmp-4.3.1-1 for cygwin-1.7 References: <4A287EBF DOT 5020408 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4A2886AD DOT 7000602 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4A2886AD.7000602@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On 04/06/2009 21:22, David Billinghurst wrote: >> As the gmp and mpfr maintainer, can I do anything to fix this? > > Are you able to reproduce this? I see you built these with gcc4 but > with a static libgcc; maybe adding -shared-libgcc would help? This is the same problem we experienced with file-5.0.whatever-it-was just a little while ago. There is an old bug in ld thst emits relocs that shouldn't be there when compiling a DLL; these relocs then end up getting turned into invalid addresses by rebase, which has no reason to believe there's anything incorrect about them and probably nothing it could do even if it did. If you build with fresh binutils from CVS head, the created DLL doesn't have the problematic reloc. We're rushing out a new binutils release just as soon as PR977 can be resolved. cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/