X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <23854963.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:39:44 -0700 (PDT) From: masc To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: FAQ 4.46, applications interfere with subversion or not? In-Reply-To: <4A2698BB.4060404@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <23853503 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4A2698BB DOT 4060404 AT acm DOT org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Im using 1.5, will try 1.7 now to see how that goes.. How can I help you to trace it down? David Rothenberger wrote: > > Are you using Cygwin 1.5 or 1.7? I have disabled this hack in the 1.7 > build because I was hoping 1.7's more robust file renaming and deleting > code would come to the rescue. If you're using 1.7, I can roll another > build with the hack enabled to see if that helps. If you're using 1.5, > I'll need your help to debug this so I can adjust the hack to retry in > this case. I only see the problem occasionally here. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FAQ-4.46%2C-applications-interfere-with-subversion-or-not--tp23853503p23854963.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/