X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A1DA33D.1080406@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:31:57 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Long file names not working in cygwin-1.7.0-48 References: <20090520135009 DOT 5D9C3BD0 AT resin18 DOT mta DOT everyone DOT net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com jpa wrote: > oz.net> writes: > >> I can't access long path and file names after updating to cygwin-1.7.0-48. > Reverting to cygwin-1.7.0-47 >> fixes the problem. I also tried the 2009-05-18 Snapshot DLL. Hopefully this > isn't a user error. >> > > Sorry to harp on this but I can't create a directory structure with a long file > name in cygwin-1.7.0-48 where I can in -47. I'm quite new to cygwin. Is there a > way for me to test the long file name support and report back to the list so we > can see if this is a user error? Probably the easiest way to get feedback on whether this is a user error or not is to send a STC so that it's easy for someone else to run your example and see the results. It also would clarify exactly what you're doing, so there's no guess-work involved. I'd also recommend sending your 'cygcheck -s -r -v' output as requested by , if you haven't already as part of this thread. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/