X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 00:17:09 +0300
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Subject: Re: emacs -nw keypad (was: [1.5] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-2)
In-reply-to: <2377ADF68DFE455199B53E97E5747E43@HEPNTLTIM3>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <83my90sx0q.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4A168F2B DOT 4020805 AT cornell DOT edu> <2377ADF68DFE455199B53E97E5747E43 AT HEPNTLTIM3>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> From: "Tim Adye" <T DOT J DOT Adye AT rl DOT ac DOT uk>
> Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 19:23:28 +0100
> Keywords: Addressed to T DOT J DOT Adye AT rl DOT ac DOT uk
> 
> I have however found one problem with this experimental release 23.0.92-2:
> when I run it in no-window mode (emacs -nw) in an xterm (or rxvt), the
> keypad keys do not seem to be defined or mapped to emacs functions.

Emacs does support rxvt, but maybe the Cygwin port of rxvt is not
sufficiently compatible.

If you type some of the keypad keys, and then type "C-h l" (that's the
letter ell, not the digit one), what does Emacs show in the *Help*
buffer that pops up?  If the keypad keys are visible to Emacs, you
should see either escape sequences or key names there.

> Indeed, as far as I can see (http://gnu.org/software/emacs), the
> current stable release is 22.3, so by implication this version 23.0
> is unstable.

Emacs 23 is in pretest, but it's quite stable (and very close to an
official release).  Which does not mean it cannot have bugs,
especially on Cygwin, where the last stable version is an ancient one.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/