X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A134D6C.7000700@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:23:08 -0400 From: Patrick Aikens User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.5] Problem with OpenSSH on Windows Home Server (Win2003) References: <4A0CEE5B DOT 6060301 AT gmail DOT com> <4A10C051 DOT 3050401 AT gmail DOT com> <4A129310 DOT 9070502 AT gmail DOT com> <4A129D81 DOT 5010801 AT gmail DOT com> <941a6680905190955y33d3cbebrdf5201fe12585bc2 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4A13230E DOT 2000100 AT cygwin DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4A13230E.2000100@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > On 05/19/2009, Patrick Aikens wrote: >> I can log in using a password for any user who is a member of the >> Administrators group. Many of the guides I've seen on installing >> OpenSSH on windows (especially 2003 server) have you add new users to >> the Admin group, so this seems to be a common necessity. If this is a >> known restriction? If so, I'll go ahead and stick to allowing >> key-based authentication only. > > There does appear to be an issue with logging in using password > authentication if the user is not part of the Administrators group. > I've been able to reproduce the problem on XP with a new user that > has never logged in. Although I tried this with 1.7, I didn't > enable any fancy authentication options available there, so it > should be a pretty good match functionally to 1.5's version. If you > haven't tried this already, you might try switching the users in > question to be in the "Adminstrators" group, logging in through ssh > (or just through Windows), and then switching back, assuming the users > in question haven't started Cygwin's 'bash' shell before when they > logged in. This didn't resolve the log in issues I saw but did > change them from a permissions issue (i.e. "Permission denied") > to a successful login that was immediately closed. I've looked > some at the latter issue and the server is receiving SIGCHLD, > which suggests that things are getting killed off right at the > start of the session but I don't know more than this. This is > really Corinna's ballywick but she's on vacation. So it may have > to wait for her return to get the real low-down (and it's possible > it has already been discussed but I wasn't paying attention. ;-) ) > In any case, if public key authentication will serve you fine, I'd > recommend using it. It's defintely more secure than password > authentication. > Thanks for the reply. I'd rather use public key authentication anyway... I was concerned that the inability to log in using password authentication in this case might point to a deeper problem that might cause me grief later on. If the extent of the problem is simply with sshd, I'm fine with using public key authentication. Thanks for the help. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/