X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:49:19 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [1.7] bug in printf and %ls From: Alexey Borzenkov To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Alexey Borzenkov wrote: > And I found why. It appears that there's a bug in printf with %ls that > will refuse to print the string completely if the wide string for %ls > cannot be represented in current charset. [...] > Prints nothing, i.e. it doesn't print neither of single quotes. So, as it seems printf on linux abort like that too, although it manages to print first single quote first. So the only remaining question is why newlib doesn't print the first single quote. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/