X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Jason Pyeron" To: References: <8881AD4AE397468EA9277BFB94782F18 AT phoenix> <4A0849F3 DOT 4090502 AT cygwin DOT com> <4A0852A1 DOT 6050604 AT cygwin DOT com> <5F6283A8965E432A89BC3CD6B980DAAB AT phoenix> <4A087770 DOT 3090602 AT cygwin DOT com> <4A089163 DOT 7050600 AT cygwin DOT com> Subject: RE: Mount of VSS volumes (//?/GLOBALROOT/...) does not work Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:38:27 -0400 Message-ID: <52D12DDA854B44358ABC8B7ED621C2B4@phoenix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <4A089163.7050600@cygwin.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Hall (Cygwin) > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 16:58 > Subject: Re: Mount of VSS volumes (//?/GLOBALROOT/...) does not work > > Jason Pyeron wrote: > > Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote on Monday, May 11, 2009 15:07: > > > >> Jason Pyeron wrote: > >>> Sorry, I ignored the list addresses, I always try to > remove peoples' > >>> addresses. (any suggestions for outlok 2003?) > >> > >> > >> I don't use Outlook so I can't speak for this but I've > heard others > >> on the list mention it. > >> > > > > Sorta nice, but still does not let me munge the email > address, infact > > it gets all confused on lists. It put cygwin-owner atsign > cygwin.com > > for this email, and it is failing to strip sigs after sig > dashes. But it quotes mail nicely. > > Sounds like it could use a patch or two. ;-) Maybe someone > else on this list that uses it would have some ideas. > I offered him a bounty today to OSS it, we shall see. > >>>>> Hmm, could I get a primmer on where to look to understand more. > >>>>> I.E. which sources/functions. > >> > >>> 546&conten t-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=src> > >>> > >>> Here is the question I am going with: If the path starts > with \\?\ > >>> don't strip the trailing slash, can this be cost > effective or only > >>> cost more in that case? > >> The real question that comes into play this path > conversion code is > >> whether or not any additional check/code is cost effective. > > > > Perfectly understood. > > > >> This code is called constantly so a change that adds to > the overhead > >> of this call is going to be magnified many times, which is > obviously > >> a negative. > >> > > > > Has anyone done a branching analysis on it? I have not finished > > groking it all yet, but there is Allways Room for Improvement(TM). > > I can't say. I haven't. Certainly if there's a way to make > this faster, easier, and better without any sacrifices, I > think that would be generally welcome. :-) We have a new intern starting next week. I think we can take a look at it over the next few weeks to see what is going on. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/