X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4A01AE4B.6020505@cornell.edu> Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 11:35:39 -0400 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: cygwin-1.7.0-47 References: <4A01A6B4 DOT 3070408 AT cornell DOT edu> <4A01ADC1 DOT 70902 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4A01ADC1.70902@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 5/6/2009 11:33 AM, Dave Korn wrote: > Maybe it would suffice if we put some kind of visual indication in the > chooser that there were excluded packages? Say we added a dummy entry at the > end of the list that couldn't be clicked on and that just said > > [ ... more packages filtered out by search string ... ] > > in italics or something like that? That sounds like a good idea to me. That way a person could choose the partial view, be warned that there are more packages being installed, and still have the search string available if they want to continue using it. I only made the comment because the mailing list is full of complaints from people who accidentally update packages. It would be a shame if this improvement to setup.exe were to lead to more people having such problems. Ken -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/