X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49FBDB6D.7040504@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 01:34:37 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.5] v. [1.7] unison: version clash? References: <49FB47AE DOT 3010401 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net> <20090501191256 DOT GE11295 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <49FB5F2B DOT 1080400 AT gmail DOT com> <20090502004130 DOT GA7586 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20090502004130.GA7586@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > I think we decided in cygwin-apps that cygwin packages should be > numbered differently between 1.5 and 1.7 just for clarity since the > namespace isn't reflected in the package name. That matches my recollection. Even tho setup.exe/setup-1.7.exe know about the implicit namespaces, we use different release numbers to avoid confusing normal humans. Not sure what that says about Dave... -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/