X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <49FB5F2B.1080400@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 21:44:27 +0100
From: Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [1.5] v. [1.7] unison: version clash?
References: <49FB47AE DOT 3010401 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net> <g3imv4l6pplfoop53pt9d6jbvppluvm601 AT 4ax DOT com> <20090501191256 DOT GE11295 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20090501191256.GE11295@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 03:09:04PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>>> I know they are downloaded from different directories release/ and release-2/ and installed into different versions of Cygwin [1.5] and [1.7] but up to now different package versions have always had different version numbers.
>>> With the most recent update of unison this convention has been broken:

>>> If the "convention" identified above is real and intended (which I hope it is) please could the version numbering for this latest installation of unison be corrected to adhere to it?
>> Fergus, you're right.  Sorry, I forgot about that.  Friggin PITA, packaging
>> for 1.5 and 1.7...
> 
> Doh.  I forgot too.  I should have noticed this when I uploaded.

  I must be feeling a little "special" today.  Why should there be any
relationship between 1.5 package numbers and 1.7 package numbers?

    cheers,
      DaveK

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/