X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49FA81C0.5050502@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 00:59:44 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gcc4: goodbye const struct problems? References: <49FA7053 DOT 1050706 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> In-Reply-To: <49FA7053.1050706@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > With 1.7, gcc4, and the same binutils, I no longer see the const struct > .rdata issues that we had with some packages with 1.5 and gcc3. Is that > to be expected, what changed to cause this to occur, and can I rely on > this for the future? See full explanation here: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-02/msg00341.html short version: we now use the "alternative" linker script (which merges .rdata into .data unconditionally) by default. Later plan is to incorporate Kai Teitz's pseudo-reloc v2 support. But in either case, the const struct stuff should no longer cause any heartburn. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/