X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <49F70CD6.6030908@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:04:06 +0000
From: Greg Chicares <gchicares AT sbcglobal DOT net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Should gcc -p work?
References: <49F707F4 DOT 6050004 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <49F707F4.6050004@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 2009-04-28 13:43Z, David Billinghurst wrote:
> I am looking into some gcc-4.{4,5}testsuite failures on cygwin.  Test 
> gcc.dg/20021014-1.c, with CFLAGS="-O2 -p", fails due to undefined 
> references to _mcount and __monstartup.  I get the same result with 
> gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.3.2.  If this is expected then I will submit a gcc 
> testsuite patch to skip this test.

Does the test have '-p' in LDFLAGS, too?

Does it work with '-pg' but fail with '-p'?

Perhaps this is related:
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg01131.html

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/