X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:21:09 +0300 (EEST)
From: Markus Rinne <markus DOT rinne AT tut DOT fi>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 1.7: snprintf() with gcc -std=c99: warning about implicit   declaration
In-Reply-To: <49EBE12A.1080305@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0904202213540.3437@fenrir.sidaroth.foo>
References: <alpine DOT LNX DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 0904192315360 DOT 3751 AT fenrir DOT sidaroth DOT foo> <49EBE12A DOT 1080305 AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Dave Korn wrote:

>  I wonder how many other functions would need the same treatment, do you
> happen to have an idea?

vsnprintf, vscanf, vsscanf and vfscanf have similar situation.

Markus Rinne

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/