X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49E8963F.1040502@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:46:23 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.7: Problem with Vista64b ACLs and sockets References: <49E7764B DOT 7080700 AT veritech DOT com> <20090417094415 DOT GC5200 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49E851D1 DOT 4050107 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090417100357 DOT GE5200 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20090417100357.GE5200@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Yes, sure, but in that case, why not use the native ping? AFAIK the > ICMP API doesn't provide all the data you need to emulate the usual > UNIX ping output anyway. AFAIK, the native (e.g. the shipped-with-windows) ping doesn't use the ICMP dll either. That's why I installed FPing. However, FPing (or even shipped-with-windows ping) are native, not cygwin progs. I don't like using native progs at all, ever, if I can help it. They always lead to surprises: pty issues in terminals, issues with pathnames, difficulties in complex commands (pipes |), etc. But it was just an idle thought. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/