X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49DEBFEA.8030503@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:41:30 +0100 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.7] deleting in-use directories References: <20090409170228 DOT GA5231 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20090409170228.GA5231@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 9 16:13, Eric Blake wrote: >> The Autoconf testsuite is failing several tests on cygwin 1.7 that used to pass >> on cygwin 1.5. I've traced it to the fact that 1.7 is trying to be smarter >> about deleting in-use files and directories, but doesn't quite get things right. > > Incredible but true. It was an alignment problem with a local buffer > in the function which moves the directory to the bin when a sharing > violation occurs. This seems to be a new problem with gcc-4. As long > as I built Cygwin with gcc-3, I never had this problem. -vvvv? What alignment does the buffer require? What did it end up getting with gcc-4? cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/