X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <49DA1A6E.1070605@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:06:22 +0100
From: Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Reverting from 1.7.0-45 [was Re: [1.7]: For the love of god,  	don't  update!]
References: <49D97797 DOT 9080902 AT gmail DOT com> <49D9913B DOT 7030708 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <49D99981 DOT 4030503 AT gmail DOT com> <49D99A02 DOT 7070407 AT gmail DOT com> <49D99D65 DOT 8040304 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <49D9C684 DOT 8030201 AT gmail DOT com> <49D9FDA4 DOT 7050005 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090406140601 DOT GD4134 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <20090406140601.GD4134@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr  6 09:03, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> Dave Korn wrote:
>>>   LOLWUT?  It turns out something has gone horribly wrong in the alternatives
>>> department now:
>>> [...]
>> Actually, from Corinna's reply, it appears that, in addition to
>> reverting *alternatives* because of the dependence that the new -10
>> package has on the the cygwin-1.7.0-45 ctype export, you may also need
>> to revert any package that USES alternatives (or, at least, run
>> /usr/sbin/alternatives to recreate the symlinks using the "old" method)
> 
> Actually, what I was trying to imply is that reverting to a pre-45 test
> release is not a good idea at all.  Try to find the reason for your
> problem while -45 is running.  Let's go forward, not backward, please.

  Well, as you see I did in the end, but when I'm trying to get a big and
complex job finished I don't always want to stop and go explore a side-track
for a couple of days.  That doesn't mean I wouldn't come back to it later, but
I gotta prioritise.

    cheers,
      DaveK




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/