X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <65980.93034.qm@web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:13:43 +0000 (GMT) From: Marco Atzeri Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: {libhdf5_0,libhdf5-devel,hdf5}-1.6.8-{3,4} To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Peter Rosin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --- Sab 21/3/09, Peter Rosin ha scritto: > Da: Peter Rosin=20 > Oggetto: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: {libhdf5_0,libhdf5-devel,hdf5}-1.6.8= -{3,4} > A: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Data: Sabato 21 marzo 2009, 20:33 > Den 2009-03-21 18:03 skrev Marco > Atzeri: > > Versions {libhdf5_0,libhdf5-devel,hdf5}-1.6.8-3=A0 > for cygwin-1.7 > > {libhdf5_0,libhdf5-devel,hdf5}-1.6.8-4=A0 for > cygwin-1.5 >=20 > Is it a good idea - longterm - to have lower numbers for > cygwin-1.7? >=20 > Cheers, > Peter in this case is just by accident, usually I made reverse. In any case it is only relevant that the two versions have a different number to avoid confusion between packages. Regards Marco -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/