X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <49C540ED.2060208@lysator.liu.se>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:33:01 +0100
From: Peter Rosin <peda AT lysator DOT liu DOT se>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: {libhdf5_0,libhdf5-devel,hdf5}-1.6.8-{3,4}
References: <announce DOT 40092 DOT 41895 DOT qm AT web25006 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <announce.40092.41895.qm@web25006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Den 2009-03-21 18:03 skrev Marco Atzeri:
> Versions 
> {libhdf5_0,libhdf5-devel,hdf5}-1.6.8-3  for cygwin-1.7
> {libhdf5_0,libhdf5-devel,hdf5}-1.6.8-4  for cygwin-1.5

Is it a good idea - longterm - to have lower numbers for cygwin-1.7?

Cheers,
Peter

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/