X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Eric Blake <ebb9 AT byu DOT net>
Subject:  Re: Q: Is anybody here using the CYGWIN=codepage:oem setting?
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:41:20 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 29
Message-ID:  <loom.20090319T193406-675@post.gmane.org>
References:  <20090319130909 DOT GZ9322 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49C281F7 DOT 6080602 AT acm DOT org> <20090319181323 DOT GB1868 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49C29366 DOT 8080708 AT acm DOT org> <20090319192031 DOT GB9322 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090319192229 DOT GC9322 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes:

> > > I have no idea whether du calls setlocale() or not.

It, and all the other coreutils, do call setlocale.  Pretty much any 
application that ships with *.mo files does so (that is, any application that 
used gettext).

> 
> ...unless Cygwin itself would call setlocale().

I'm not a fan of that.  POSIX is explicit that an application that 
intentionally avoids calling setlocale() shall behave as though it had called 
setlocale(LC_ALL,"C").  If cygwin called setlocale(LC_ALL,"") on applications' 
behalf, then this will break POSIX-compliance of existing programs.  Not all 
programs are internationalized yet.  For example, I know that m4 does NOT call 
setlocale.  On the other hand, I also have no idea how (or even if) m4 would 
break if cygwin called setlocale on its behalf; about the only functions it 
calls at the moment where running in a locale besides C would have an impact 
would be in things like calls to strtod() (not likely to affect many users).  
And one of my goals, as upstream m4 maintainer, is to eventually get m4 to the 
same state as coreutils where gettext is used to provide translated messages.

I guess I'm declaring that I have no idea what the best approach would be, but 
I would like for locales to work without having to worry about changing $CYGWIN.

-- 
Eric Blake



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/