X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Matthew Woehlke Subject: Re: gcc4: cc Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:28:51 -0500 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <49C0467A DOT 1080404 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <49C07906 DOT 2060504 AT gmail DOT com> <49C1CA1E DOT 20509 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <49C1CFE7 DOT 1030401 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <49C1E05A DOT 2060206 AT gmail DOT com> <49C1E756 DOT 7000007 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090105 Fedora/2.0.0.19-1.fc10 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 In-Reply-To: <49C1E756.7000007@users.sourceforge.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > Are there supposed to be similar names for the ISO C++ > standards (c++98 and c++0x)? My guess would be "no"; at least, there isn't anything with near the penetration of 'cc', given that I can name about a half dozen c++ compiler names off the top of my head. -- Matthew Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies. -- "Two IIRC's must make a right" -- Larry Hall (paraphrased) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/