X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HK_OBFDOM,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Z,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49BDCAF0.7010906@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:43:44 -0500 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] New: {xz/liblzma0/liblzma-devel}-4.999.8beta-10 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------040408070705030006070003" Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --------------040408070705030006070003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Charles Wilson wrote: > The xz package is the successor to lzma. Its command-line tools > support both .lzma files and the new .xz format, and it ships with > compatibility links so you don't even need to retrain your fingers: > 'lzma', 'lzcat', etc, are all still present. However, you probably > should: .xz files are already being used by some upstream source > distribution sites, including GNU FSF, and the new format includes > features (such as internal integrity checks) that the old .lzma > format lacks. So if I'm reading this right, is the attached patch for cygport correct? Yaakov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkm9yvAACgkQpiWmPGlmQSMSpgCgnfNDamXcjsZGkwue/rZbWjGi ACcAoN2qUvsChi2FhCSdgLOclhFygzqV =Cr4s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------040408070705030006070003 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="cygport-xz.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="cygport-xz.patch" Index: bin/cygport.in =================================================================== --- bin/cygport.in (revision 6005) +++ bin/cygport.in (working copy) @@ -602,9 +602,9 @@ *.asc|*.md5|*.sig|*.sign) continue ;; *.tar.bz2|*.tbz2|*.tar.bz|*.tbz) unpack_cmd="tar jxf" ;; *.tar.gz|*.tgz|*.tar.Z) unpack_cmd="tar zxf" ;; - *.tar.lzma) - check_prog_req lzma - unpack_cmd="tar --lzma -xf" + *.tar.lzma|*.tar.xz) + check_prog_req xz + unpack_cmd="tar --xz -xf" ;; *.tar.lzo) check_prog_req lzop --------------040408070705030006070003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ --------------040408070705030006070003--