X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <49BD1397.1080601@gmail.com> References: <295903 DOT 31584 DOT qm AT web25007 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> <49BD1397 DOT 1080601 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:42:19 -0400 Message-ID: <2bf229d30903150942m55d4ee9ej81e2ffc0f0b15000@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: using gcc-4.3.2-2: gcc-4 -shared-libgcc From: Chris Sutcliffe To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > =A0I have come to the conclusion that it was probably a mistake on my par= t not > to make shared libgcc default in this release. =A0I will probably do a fa= irly > rapid re-release to change this. =A0(Might move to 4.3.3 while I'm doing = it, and > should I make -4 the default?) I've used gcc-4 to compile several apps without issue now, so personally I think it's safe to make it the default. Cheers! Chris --=20 Chris Sutcliffe http://emergedesktop.org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/