X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,J_CHICKENPOX_41,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: ABCD <en DOT ABCD AT gmail DOT com>
Subject:  Re: [1.7] rebaseall doesn't solve the problem
Date:  Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:42:01 -0400
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <gp659h$256$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <499F6682 DOT 1090204 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090224100616 DOT GC6035 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49A85971 DOT 6070300 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090228104337 DOT GG19887 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49A986B4 DOT 2080501 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090228201625 DOT GA8503 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49A9AA0C DOT 9020904 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090301102035 DOT GB10046 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <gp4cb8$boh$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <49B66C43 DOT 3050203 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090106)
In-Reply-To: <49B66C43.3050203@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Charles Wilson wrote:
> Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Feb 28 16:18, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>>> I'm open to suggestions.  "peimgflags"?  Currently, aslr only
>>> peflags?
>> $0.02 from a mostly-lurker-these-days: chpe{h,hdr,header,f,flags}? That
>> way it's a verb instead of a noun...
>>
> 
> ...except that the utility can also be used to display the flag values,
> as well. So 'ch*' (as in 'change*') isn't very accurate, either.
> 
> --
> Chuck
> 
> 

USD0.02 from another lurker: split it into two programs, lspeflags and
chpeflags (or whatever)?

- --
ABCD
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkm2mFkACgkQOypDUo0oQOr5BgCdF/ylr0/+sM3jF7d9XpLnz4I3
wrMAoIkZBple24MfvzpVNA3MCwOgjO8D
=3pGf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/