X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:07:33 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [1.7] rebaseall doesn't solve the problem
Message-ID: <20090303050733.GA28708@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <49A85971 DOT 6070300 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090228104337 DOT GG19887 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49A986B4 DOT 2080501 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090228195127 DOT GA26646 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090228202850 DOT GB8503 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090302120756 DOT GA31166 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49ABF7B5 DOT 5010605 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <49AC56FE DOT 4080708 AT gmail DOT com> <20090303042825 DOT GA27645 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <49ACB96C DOT 10808 AT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49ACB96C.10808@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:00:28AM +0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:00:30PM +0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>
>>>--pe-dll-characteristics=<name>|<integer>[(+|,:)<name>|<integer>[...]]
>
>>I thought we'd established that these aren't just dll characteristics.
>
>Well, it's the name of the field in the PE IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER (coff
>extension header), so it's canonical, regardless if it also applies to
>executables.

Yes, I am aware of this.

Regardless, I don't think a publicly-exposed interface should be unclear
like this.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/